CVE-2023-5679
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the bind package. This issue may allow an attacker to query in a DNS64 enabled resolver node with a domain name triggering a server-stale data, triggering a code assertion, and resulting in a crash of named processes. This can allow a remote unauthenticated user to cause a Denial Of Service in the DNS server.
Statement
The identified vulnerability in the BIND DNS server poses a important severity risk due to its potential to induce a Denial of Service (DoS) through a targeted exploitation of DNS64 functionality. Specifically, the flaw allows an attacker to send a crafted domain query that triggers a code assertion failure within the named process. This leads to a crash of the DNS server, disrupting its ability to resolve queries and maintain network operations. As a result, the DNS service becomes unavailable to legitimate users, impacting the integrity and availability of network services and potentially disrupting business operations or network communications. The exploitation of this vulnerability by an unauthenticated remote user underscores the urgent need for immediate patching and mitigation to safeguard DNS infrastructure against service outages.
Mitigation
This vulnerability can be mitigated by either disabled server-stale configuration, using both of the switches bellow in named configuration file:
1) set stale-cache-enable no;
2) set stale-answer-enable no;
Alternatively, disable the DNS64 option. Both mitigations should make the affected code unreachable, making it impossible to an attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2263909: bind9: Enabling both DNS64 and serve-stale may cause an assertion failure during recursive resolution
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-617: Reachable Assertion
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-5679
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5679
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-5679
Content from kb.isc.org is not included.https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2023-5679
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | bind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | bind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | bind9.16 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1781 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | bind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support | bind9.16 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1647 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support | bind9.16 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1648 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1789 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind-dyndb-ldap | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1789 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2551 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind-dyndb-ldap | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2551 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | dhcp | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Extended Update Support | bind | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1800 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Extended Update Support | bind-dyndb-ldap | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1800 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support | bind | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1803 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support | bind-dyndb-ldap | Fixed | RHSA-2024:1803 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | |
| Integrity Impact | None | |
| Availability Impact | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.