CVE-2023-6129
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in in the POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL, affecting applications running on PowerPC CPU-based platforms that utilize vector instructions, and has the potential to corrupt the internal state of these applications. If an attacker can manipulate the utilization of the POLY1305 MAC algorithm, it may lead to the corruption of the application state, resulting in various application-dependent consequences, often resulting in a crash and leading to a denial of service.
Statement
This vulnerability is categorized as having a Low severity due to the limited scope of its potential impact and the specific conditions required for exploitation. The vulnerability arises in the POLY1305 MAC implementation within OpenSSL on PowerPC CPUs, affecting newer processors supporting PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The issue involves the restoration of vector registers in a different order than they are saved, potentially corrupting application state upon return to the caller. The impact varies, contingent on the application's reliance on non-volatile XMM registers, ranging from incorrect calculations to potential denial of service. However, the practical exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to influence the use of the POLY1305 MAC algorithm. Given the specific conditions needed for exploitation and the absence of concrete instances of affected applications, the overall risk is assessed as low. Additionally, the severity is tempered by the assumption that the most likely outcome is limited to incorrect results in application-dependent calculations or crashes, rather than enabling a full compromise of the application process.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2257571: openssl: POLY1305 MAC implementation corrupts vector registers on PowerPC
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-328: Use of Weak Hash
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-6129
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6129
Content from www.openssl.org is not included.https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240109.txt
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | mysql8.0 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | mariadb10.11 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | mysql | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | openssl | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | mariadb | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | openssl | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | ovmf | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | mysql:8.0/mysql | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | compat-openssl10 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | edk2 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | mariadb:10.11/mariadb | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | mariadb:10.3/mariadb | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | mariadb:10.5/mariadb | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | shim | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | mysql | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | openssl | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2447 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | edk2 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:9088 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | compat-openssl11 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | mariadb | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | mariadb:10.11/mariadb | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | shim | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Core Services | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Software Collections | rh-mariadb105-mariadb | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Software Collections | rh-mysql80-mysql | Out of support scope |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | High |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | Low | Low |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.