CVE-2023-6237
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. When the EVP_PKEY_public_check() function is called in RSA public keys, a computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite. For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this computation completes quickly. However, if n is a large prime, this computation takes a long time. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack.
Statement
Red Hat Product Security rates the severity of this flaw as determined by the upstream OpenSSL security team.
The marked moderate issue in OpenSSL involves a flaw in the EVP_PKEY_public_check() function used for RSA public keys. When verifying keys, the computation to confirm the composite nature of the RSA modulus may take an extended time if the modulus is a large prime. This vulnerability could be exploited for a Denial of Service attack in applications using this function with RSA keys from untrusted sources. The severity is moderate as it requires specific conditions for exploitation and may not pose an immediate widespread threat.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2258502: openssl: Excessive time spent checking invalid RSA public keys
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2023-6237
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6237
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6237
Content from www.openssl.org is not included.https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240115.txt
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | ovmf | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | compat-openssl10 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | edk2 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | shim | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | openssl | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2447 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | edk2 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:9088 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | compat-openssl11 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | shim | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Core Services | openssl | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5 | openssl | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.9 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | High | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | |
| Integrity Impact | None | |
| Availability Impact | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.