CVE-2024-1135
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
An HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability was found in Gunicorn. By crafting requests with conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, attackers can bypass security restrictions and access restricted endpoints. This issue is due to Gunicorn's handling of Transfer-Encoding headers, where it incorrectly processes requests with multiple, conflicting Transfer-Encoding headers, treating them as chunked regardless of the final encoding specified. This vulnerability allows for a range of attacks, including cache poisoning, session manipulation, and data exposure.
Mitigation
Red Hat has investigated whether a possible mitigation exists for this issue, and has not been able to identify a practical example. Please update the affected package as soon as possible.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2275280: python-gunicorn: HTTP Request Smuggling due to improper validation of Transfer-Encoding headers
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2024-1135
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1135
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1135
Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w3h3-4rj7-4ph4
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| RHUI 4 for RHEL 8 | python-gunicorn | Fixed | RHSA-2025:1335 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 8 | python3x-gunicorn | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3781 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 9 | python-gunicorn | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3781 |
| Red Hat Discovery 1 | discovery-server-container | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | python-gunicorn | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12 | openshift4/ose-ironic-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3713 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.13 | openshift4/ose-ironic-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2875 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14 | openshift4/ose-ironic-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3331 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15 | openshift4/ose-ironic-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3327 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1 | python-gunicorn | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 | python-gunicorn | Fixed | RHSA-2024:4054 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 9 | python-gunicorn | Fixed | RHSA-2024:2727 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0 | python-gunicorn | Affected | |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-rhel8 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Satellite 6.15 for RHEL 8 | python-gunicorn | Fixed | RHSA-2024:7987 |
| Red Hat Storage 3 | graphite-web | Out of support scope |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | |
| Integrity Impact | High | |
| Availability Impact | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.