CVE-2024-12797

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Description

A flaw was found in OpenSSL's RFC7250 Raw Public Key (RPK) authentication. This vulnerability allows man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks via failure to abort TLS/DTLS handshakes when the server's RPK does not match the expected key despite the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode being set.

Statement

This issue was introduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2, which was first shipped in RHEL 9.5. Earlier releases of OpenSSL provided in RHEL prior to 9.5 are not affected.

RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue only arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the server, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate chain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to fail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys, by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.

Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw public key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those that do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.

rhel9/ruby-33 & ubi9/ruby-33 are not affected because RPK is not present in any form or as any function that could be called from Ruby via Red Hat supported RPMs in RHEL. For example the SSL_dane_enable or SSL_add_expected_rpk or X509_STORE_CTX_get0_rpk or X509_STORE_CTX_init_rpk (and more rpk-related) functions are not callable from Ruby.

Mitigation

Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.

Additional Information

External References

Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12797

Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12797

Content from openssl-library.org is not included.https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt

Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata

Products / Services Components State Errata
Builds for Red Hat OpenShift 1.3.2 openshift-builds/openshift-builds-git-cloner-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2025:2754
Builds for Red Hat OpenShift 1.3.2 openshift-builds/openshift-builds-shared-resource-webhook-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2025:2754
Builds for Red Hat OpenShift 1.3.2 openshift-builds/openshift-builds-waiters-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2025:2754
Discovery 1 for RHEL 9 discovery/discovery-server-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2025:1487
Discovery 1 for RHEL 9 discovery/discovery-ui-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2025:1487
RHOL-5.9-RHEL-9 openshift-logging/cluster-logging-operator-bundle Fixed RHSA-2025:1985
RHOL-5.9-RHEL-9 openshift-logging/cluster-logging-rhel9-operator Fixed RHSA-2025:1985
RHOL-5.9-RHEL-9 openshift-logging/eventrouter-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2025:1985
RHOL-5.9-RHEL-9 openshift-logging/fluentd-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2025:1985
RHOL-5.9-RHEL-9 openshift-logging/log-file-metric-exporter-rhel9 Fixed RHSA-2025:1985
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown Red Hat NVD
CVSS v3 Base Score 7.4
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity High
Privileges Required None
User Interaction None
Scope Unchanged
Confidentiality Impact High
Integrity Impact High
Availability Impact None

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

For open source software shipped by multiple vendors, the CVSS base scores may vary for each vendor's version depending on the version they ship, how they ship it, the platform, and even how the software is compiled. This makes scoring of vulnerabilities difficult for third-party vulnerability databases such as NVD that only provide a single CVSS base score for each vulnerability. Red Hat scores reflect how a vulnerability affects our products specifically.

For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?

  • "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
  • "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

A "will not fix" status means that a fix for an affected product version is not planned or not possible due to complexity, which may create additional risk.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

A deferred status means that a fix for an affected product version is not guaranteed due to higher-priority development work.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
  • Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.

What is a mitigation?

A mitigation is an action that can be taken to reduce the impact of a security vulnerability, without deploying any fixes.

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

The listed products were found to include one or more of the components that this vulnerability affects. These products underwent a thorough evaluation to determine their affectedness by this vulnerability. Note that layered products (such as container-based offerings) that consume affected components from any of the products listed in this table may be affected and are not represented.

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

In order to maintain code stability and compatibility, Red Hat usually does not rebase packages to entirely new versions. Instead, we backport fixes and new features to an older version of the package we distribute. This can result in some security scanners that only consider the package version to report the package as vulnerable. To avoid this, we suggest that you use an approved vulnerability scanner from our This content is not included.Red Hat Vulnerability Scanner Certification program.

My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?

When a product is listed as "Out of Support Scope", it means a vulnerability with the impact level assigned to this CVE is no longer covered by its current support lifecycle phase. The product has been identified to contain the impacted component, but analysis to determine whether it is affected or not by this vulnerability was not performed. The product should be assumed to be affected. Customers are advised to apply any mitigation options documented on this page, consider removing or disabling the impacted component, or upgrade to a supported version of the product that has an update available.