CVE-2024-22189
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in quic-go. This issue may allow an attacker to trigger a denial of service by sending a large number of NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames that retire old connection IDs. The receiver is supposed to respond to each retirement frame with a RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frame, but the attacker can prevent the receiver from sending out the vast majority of these RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames by selectively acknowledging received packets and collapsing the peers congestion window and by manipulating the peer's RTT estimate.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2273513: quic-go: memory exhaustion attack against QUIC's connection ID mechanism
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2024-22189
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22189
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22189
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | rhacm2/lighthouse-agent-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.10 for RHEL 9 | rhacm2/volsync-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2024:4144 |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.10 for RHEL 9 | rhacm2/volsync-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:4144 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 | receptor | Fixed | RHSA-2024:8534 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9 | receptor | Fixed | RHSA-2024:8534 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16 | openshift4/ose-coredns-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:0041 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces (RHOSDS) 3.23 | devspaces/traefik-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:15847 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/grafana-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:5094 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/istio-cni-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:5094 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/istio-must-gather-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:5094 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/istio-rhel8-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2024:5094 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/kiali-ossmc-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:5094 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:5094 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel8-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2024:5094 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/pilot-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:5094 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/ratelimit-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:5094 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 9 | openshift-service-mesh/proxyv2-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:5094 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | |
| Integrity Impact | None | |
| Availability Impact | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.