CVE-2024-30255
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A vulnerability was found in how Envoy Proxy implements the HTTP/2 codec. There are insufficient limitations placed on the amount of CONTINUATION frames that can be sent within a single stream. This issue could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to send packets to vulnerable servers, which could use up compute resources to cause a Denial of Service.
Statement
Red Hat rates the security impact of this vulnerability as Moderate, in alignment with upstream Envoy. The worst case scenario is excessive CPU utilization causing a denial of service. Once an attack has ended, the system should return to normal operations on its own.
Mitigation
Red Hat has investigated whether a possible mitigation exists for this issue, and has not been able to identify a practical example. Please update the affected package as soon as possible.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2272986: envoy: HTTP/2 CPU exhaustion due to CONTINUATION frame flood
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-390: Detection of Error Condition Without Action
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2024-30255
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-30255
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-30255
Content from nowotarski.info is not included.https://nowotarski.info/http2-continuation-flood/
Content from www.kb.cert.org is not included.https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/421644
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Custom Metric Autoscaler operator for Red Hat Openshift | custom-metrics-autoscaler/custom-metrics-autoscaler-rhel8 | Will not fix | |
| Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift | openshift-logging/logging-loki-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| Logical Volume Manager Storage | lvms4/topolvm-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Migration Toolkit for Applications 6 | mta/mta-hub-rhel9 | Will not fix | |
| OpenShift API for Data Protection | oadp/oadp-velero-plugin-for-gcp-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| OpenShift API for Data Protection | oadp/oadp-velero-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| OpenShift Serverless | openshift-serverless-1/eventing-mtping-rhel8 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | rhacm2/acm-grafana-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | rhacm2/management-ingress-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 5 | rhceph/rhceph-5-dashboard-rhel8 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 6 | rhceph/rhceph-6-dashboard-rhel9 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 7 | rhceph/grafana-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Migration Toolkit for Containers 1.7 | rhmtc/openshift-migration-velero-plugin-for-gcp-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:4520 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift-selinuxd-container | Affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift4/ose-prometheus | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift4/ose-contour-rhel8 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Data Science (RHODS) | rhods/odh-ml-pipelines-cache-rhel8 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Data Science (RHODS) | rhods/odh-operator-base-rhel8 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces | devspaces/devspaces-rhel8-operator | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/grafana-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:7725 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/istio-cni-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:7725 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/istio-must-gather-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:7725 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/kiali-ossmc-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:7725 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:7725 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/pilot-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:7725 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/proxyv2-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:7725 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 | openshift-service-mesh/ratelimit-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:7725 |
| Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 2 | rhosdt/tempo-gateway-rhel8 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3 | rhosdt/opentelemetry-rhel8-operator | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 | osp-director-provisioner-container | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Openshift Container Storage 4 | ocs4/cephcsi-rhel8 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4 | odf4/odf-topolvm-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Openshift Sandboxed Containers | openshift-sandboxed-containers/osc-rhel8-operator | Affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.3 | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | Low | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Bartek Nowotarski (nowotarski.info) for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.