CVE-2024-37890
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the Node.js WebSocket library (ws). A request with several headers exceeding the 'server.maxHeadersCount' threshold could be used to crash a ws server, leading to a denial of service.
Mitigation
The issue can be mitigated by reducing the maximum allowed length of the request headers using the --max-http-header-size=size or the maxHeaderSize options so that no more headers than the server.maxHeadersCount limit can be sent. The issue can be mitigated also by seting server.maxHeadersCount to 0.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2292777: nodejs-ws: denial of service when handling a request with many HTTP headers
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2024-37890
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37890
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37890
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| .NET 6.0 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux | rh-dotnet60-dotnet | Out of support scope | |
| Cryostat 2 | nodejs-ws | Not affected | |
| Migration Toolkit for Applications 6 | nodejs-ws | Under investigation | |
| Migration Toolkit for Applications 7 | mta/mta-cli-rhel9 | Fix deferred | |
| Migration Toolkit for Runtimes | nodejs-ws | Under investigation | |
| Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes | multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes | multicluster-engine/multicluster-engine-console-mce-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| OpenShift Serverless | nodejs-ws | Will not fix | |
| RHODF-4.14-RHEL-9 | odf4/odf-console-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:8551 |
| RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 | odf4/odf-console-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:8544 |
| RHODF-4.16-RHEL-9 | odf4/mcg-core-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:4591 |
| RHODF-4.16-RHEL-9 | odf4/mcg-core-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:5547 |
| RHODF-4.16-RHEL-9 | odf4/odf-console-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:6755 |
| Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2 | 3scale-system | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | rhacm2/console-rhel8 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-rhel8 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | automation-controller | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | automation-eda-controller | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Build of Keycloak | nodejs-ws | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 5 | ceph | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 6 | thrift | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 7 | thrift | Affected | |
| Red Hat Data Grid 8 | nodejs-ws | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.3 on RHEL 9 | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9 | Fixed | RHBA-2024:9054 |
| Red Hat Discovery 1 | discovery-server-container | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | dotnet8.0 | Under investigation | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | dotnet6.0 | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | ceph | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | polkit | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | dotnet7.0 | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | dotnet6.0 | Under investigation | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | dotnet8.0 | Under investigation | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | gjs | Under investigation | |
| Red Hat Fuse 7 | nodejs-ws | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Integration Camel K 1 | nodejs-ws | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Data Grid 7 | nodejs-ws | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8 | nodejs-ws | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift4/ose-console | Under investigation | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces | devspaces/code-rhel8 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces | devspaces/dashboard-rhel8 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat OpenShift GitOps | openshift-gitops-1/gitops-operator-bundle | Under investigation | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines 1.15 | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-hub-ui-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3710 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines 1.15 | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-hub-ui-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3712 |
| Red Hat Openshift Container Storage 4 | ocs4/mcg-core-rhel8 | Under investigation | |
| Red Hat Process Automation 7 | nodejs-ws | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Quay 3 | quay/quay-rhel8 | Under investigation | |
| Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4 | nodejs-ws | Not affected | |
| Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2 | nodejs-ws | Not affected | |
| Red Hat build of OptaPlanner 8 | nodejs-ws | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.9 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | High | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | |
| Integrity Impact | None | |
| Availability Impact | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.