CVE-2024-4540
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Keycloak in OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests (PAR). Client-provided parameters were found to be included in plain text in the KC_RESTART cookie returned by the authorization server's HTTP response to a request_uri authorization request, possibly leading to an information disclosure vulnerability.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2279303: keycloak: exposure of sensitive information in Pushed Authorization Requests (PAR) KC_RESTART cookie
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-312: Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2024-4540
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4540
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-4540
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| RHEL-8 based Middleware Containers | rh-sso-7/sso76-openshift-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3570 |
| Red Hat Build of Keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3574 | |
| Red Hat Build of Keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3575 | |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3572 | |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 7 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3566 |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 8 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3567 |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 9 | rh-sso7-keycloak | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3568 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 22 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3573 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 22 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3573 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 22 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3573 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 24 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3576 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 24 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3576 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 24 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2024:3576 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | |
| Integrity Impact | None | |
| Availability Impact | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Manuel Schallar for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.