CVE-2024-45806

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Moderate Moderate Impact What does this mean?
7.4 CVSS v3 Base Score

Description

A vulnerability was found in Envoy that allows external clients to manipulate Envoy headers, potentially leading to unauthorized access or other malicious actions within the mesh. This issue arises due to Envoy's default configuration of internal trust boundaries, which considers all RFC1918 private address ranges as internal. The default behavior for handling internal addresses in Envoy has been changed. Previously, RFC1918 IP addresses were automatically considered internal, even if the internal_address_config was empty. The default configuration of Envoy will continue to trust internal addresses while in this release and it will not trust them by default in next release. If you have tooling such as probes on your private network which need to be treated as trusted such as changing arbitrary x-envoy headers, please explicitly include those addresses or CIDR ranges into internal_address_config. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to bypass security controls, access sensitive data, or disrupt services within the mesh, like Istio.

Statement

Red Hat's CVSS score and impact are specific to our product and may not match those of upstream. This is due to how envoy is configured and used within our OpenShift Service Mesh product.

Mitigation

This flaw can be mitigated by configuring envoy to treat all IPs as external. This is done by setting the internal_address_config range for envoy to `0.0.0.0/32`.

Additional Information

External References

Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45806

Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45806

Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/security/advisories/GHSA-ffhv-fvxq-r6mf

Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata

Products / Services Components State Errata
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 openshift-service-mesh/grafana-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2024:7725
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 openshift-service-mesh/istio-cni-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2024:7725
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 openshift-service-mesh/istio-must-gather-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2024:7725
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 openshift-service-mesh/kiali-ossmc-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2024:7725
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 openshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2024:7725
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 openshift-service-mesh/pilot-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2024:7725
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 openshift-service-mesh/proxyv2-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2024:7725
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8 openshift-service-mesh/ratelimit-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2024:7725
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 8 openshift-service-mesh/grafana-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2024:7726
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6 for RHEL 8 openshift-service-mesh/istio-cni-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2024:7726
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown Red Hat NVD
CVSS v3 Base Score 7.4 6.5
Attack Vector Network Network
Attack Complexity High Low
Privileges Required None None
User Interaction None None
Scope Unchanged Unchanged
Confidentiality Impact High Low
Integrity Impact High Low
Availability Impact None None

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation

Red Hat's CVSS score and impact are specific to our product and may not match those of upstream. This is due to how envoy is configured and used within our OpenShift Service Mesh product.

Acknowledgements

This issue was discovered by James Force (Red Hat) and Mike Whale.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

 For open source software shipped by multiple vendors, the CVSS base scores may vary for each vendor's version depending on the version they ship, how they ship it, the platform, and even how the software is compiled. This makes scoring of vulnerabilities difficult for third-party vulnerability databases such as NVD that only provide a single CVSS base score for each vulnerability. Red Hat scores reflect how a vulnerability affects our products specifically.

For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
  • "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
  • "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

 A "will not fix" status means that a fix for an affected product version is not planned or not possible due to complexity, which may create additional risk.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

 A deferred status means that a fix for an affected product version is not guaranteed due to higher-priority development work.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
  • Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.

What is a mitigation?

 A mitigation is an action that can be taken to reduce the impact of a security vulnerability, without deploying any fixes.

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

 The listed products were found to include one or more of the components that this vulnerability affects. These products underwent a thorough evaluation to determine their affectedness by this vulnerability. Note that layered products (such as container-based offerings) that consume affected components from any of the products listed in this table may be affected and are not represented.

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

 In order to maintain code stability and compatibility, Red Hat usually does not rebase packages to entirely new versions. Instead, we backport fixes and new features to an older version of the package we distribute. This can result in some security scanners that only consider the package version to report the package as vulnerable. To avoid this, we suggest that you use an approved vulnerability scanner from our This content is not included.Red Hat Vulnerability Scanner Certification program.