CVE-2024-56128
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Apache Kafka's implementation of the Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM), which did not fully adhere to the requirements of RFC 5802. Specifically, as per RFC 5802, the server must verify that the nonce sent by the client in the second message matches the nonce sent by the server in its first message. However, Kafka's SCRAM implementation did not perform this validation. In environments where SCRAM is operated over plaintext communication channels, an attacker with access to the exchange can intercept and potentially reuse authentication messages, leveraging the weak nonce validation to gain unauthorized access.
Statement
This vulnerability is marked with an Important severity because it compromises a fundamental security requirement of the SCRAM protocol as specified in RFC 5802 —the validation of nonces for ensuring message integrity and preventing replay attacks. Without proper nonce validation, an attacker with plaintext access to the SCRAM authentication exchange could manipulate or replay parts of the authentication process, potentially gaining unauthorized access or disrupting the integrity of authentication. While the use of plaintext communication for SCRAM is discouraged, many legacy systems or misconfigured deployments may still rely on it, making them directly susceptible.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2333013: kafka: Apache Kafka: SCRAM authentication vulnerable to replay attacks when used without encryption
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-303: Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2024-56128
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56128
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56128
Content from datatracker.ietf.org is not included.https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5802
https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#security_sasl_scram_security
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Fuse 7 | org.apache.kafka/kafka_2.12 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Fuse 7 | org.apache.kafka/kafka_2.13 | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Integration Camel K 1 | org.apache.kafka/kafka_2.12 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 | kafka_2.12 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 | kafka_2.13 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8 | kafka_2.12 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8 | kafka_2.13 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack | kafka_2.12 | Affected | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack | kafka_2.13 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat build of Debezium 2 | org.apache.kafka/kafka_2.13 | Not affected | |
| Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.1 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:9922 | |
| Streams for Apache Kafka 3.0.0 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:12511 | |
| Streams for Apache Kafka 3.1.0 | org.apache.kafka/kafka_2.13 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:23417 |
| streams for Apache Kafka | org.apache.kafka/kafka_2.13 | Affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.4 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | High | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | |
| Integrity Impact | High | |
| Availability Impact | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.