CVE-2024-56614
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
The MITRE CVE dictionary describes this issue as
Statement
For the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8/9 to confirm the current state, inspect the sysctl with the command:
cat /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled
The setting of 1 or 2 would mean that unprivileged users can not use eBPF, mitigating the flaw. The difference between the two is a value of 2 means that it can be re-enabled without a reboot, while a value of 1 requires a reboot to take effect.
Mitigation
The bug could happen only when XDP sockets and BPF being used. The XDP sockets allows a channel between XDP programs and userspace applications. Even if BPF enabled (by default disabled in Red Hat Enterprise Linux), it requires root privileges to trigger this issue. The mitigation is not using BPF or not using XDP. The link to the example code for the usage of XDP with BPF: This content is not included.https://medium.com/@yunwei356/ebpf-tutorial-by-example-capturing-tcp-information-with-xdp-aef77f42a8e1
Our analysis indicates that while it is out of support scope for this issue, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 is also affected. For systems on that version, the same mitigation can be applied. However, in that version, the unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl takes only two values: 0 for enabled, 1 for disabled. Unprivileged BPF can be disabled by setting that sysctl in a file, such as in /etc/sysctl.d/
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2334573: kernel: xsk: fix OOB map writes when deleting elements
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-99: Improper Control of Resource Identifiers ('Resource Injection')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2024-56614
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56614
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56614
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:6966 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions | kernel-rt | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10536 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10547 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10701 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 6.7 | 7.8 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | High | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
The default Red Hat Enterprise Linux kernel prevents unprivileged users from being able to use eBPF by the kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl. This would require a privileged user with CAP_SYS_ADMIN or root to be able to abuse this flaw reducing its attack space and the CVSS has been marked as such
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.