CVE-2024-58240
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
The MITRE CVE dictionary describes this issue as
Statement
This patch refactors TLS RX decryption to use a separate, stack-local crypto_wait for the non-async path and bypass the async reference-counting/notification logic. It doesn’t fix a user-triggerable bug by itself; it’s a correctness/simplification change that reduces coupling and prepares the ground for a follow-up fix (“tls: fix use-after-free on failed backlog decryption”). No externally exploitable behavior changes are introduced. The bug is actual for the older versions of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (before 9.3 and for all versions of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8) where patch aec7961916f3 "tls: fix race between async notify and socket close" not backported yet. The CVSS being calculated for worse case scenario where the previous patch aec7961916f3 not applied yet (that leads to the use after free possibility).
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, prevent module tls from being loaded. Please see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for how to blacklist a kernel module to prevent it from loading automatically.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2391431: kernel: tls: separate no-async decryption request handling from async
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-416: Use After Free
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2024-58240
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58240
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58240
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:21667 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:22752 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:22752 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions | kernel-rt | Fixed | RHSA-2025:19268 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:19492 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.3 | 7.8 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | High |
| Integrity Impact | Low | High |
| Availability Impact | Low | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.