CVE-2024-7592
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the http.cookies module in the Python package. When parsing cookies that contain backslashes, under certain circumstances, the module uses an algorithm with quadratic complexity, leading to excessive CPU consumption.
Statement
This vulnerability is classified as low severity, as also marked by upstream Python, because while it can cause excessive CPU usage, its exploitability is constrained by practical factors. Most production environments enforce request size limits (e.g., via web servers like Nginx or Apache), preventing attackers from sending arbitrarily large cookies.
Additionally, the impact is localized to individual requests, meaning it does not persistently degrade system performance or lead to remote code execution (RCE). The attack requires multiple large requests to have a significant effect, making it inefficient compared to more severe denial-of-service (DoS) vectors.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2305879: cpython: python: Uncontrolled CPU resource consumption when in http.cookies module
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2024-7592
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7592
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-7592
Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/123067
Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/123075
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | python3.12 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | python | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | python | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | python3 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | gimp:flatpak/python2 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python3 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python3.11 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python3.12 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python36:3.6/python36 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python39-devel:3.9/python39 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | python39:3.9/python39 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | python3.9 | Fixed | RHSA-2024:10983 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | python3.12 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:3631 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | python3.11 | Fixed | RHSA-2025:3634 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) | rhelai1/bootc-nvidia-rhel9 | Fix deferred |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 4.8 | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | None |
| User Interaction | Required | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended)
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists)
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.