CVE-2025-15281
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in glibc. When the wordexp function is called with the flags WRDE_REUSE and WRDE_APPEND, it may return uninitialized memory. If the caller inspects the we_wordv array or calls the wordfree function to free the allocated memory, the process will abort, resulting in a denial of service.
Statement
To exploit this issue, an attacker needs to find an application linked to the glibc library that is using the wordexp function with the flags WRDE_REUSE and WRDE_APPEND. Also, calls to wordexp using both flags never worked correctly and thus the existence of applications that make use of this feature is unlikely. There is no known application vulnerable to this issue.
Furthermore, this flaw will result in a denial of service with no other security impact.
Due to these reasons, this vulnerability has been rated with a low severity.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, consider refactoring the use of the wordexp function to not use the WRDE_REUSE and WRDE_APPEND flags together.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2431196: glibc: wordexp with WRDE_REUSE and WRDE_APPEND may return uninitialized memory
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2025-15281
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15281
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15281
Content from sourceware.org is not included.https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33814
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost Management 4 | costmanagement/costmanagement-metrics-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3228 |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 8 | rhceph/rhceph-8-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:5606 |
| Red Hat Discovery 2 | discovery/discovery-server-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4501 |
| Red Hat Discovery 2 | discovery/discovery-ui-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4501 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | glibc | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | compat-glibc | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | glibc | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | compat-glibc | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | glibc | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | glibc | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4772 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | glibc | Fixed | RHSA-2026:2786 |
| Red Hat Insights proxy 1.5 | insights-proxy/insights-proxy-container-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4655 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | rhcos | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/cds-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4943 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/haproxy-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4943 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/installer-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4943 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/rhua-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4943 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.9 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | High | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | |
| Integrity Impact | None | |
| Availability Impact | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.