CVE-2025-32462
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A privilege escalation vulnerability was found in Sudo. In certain configurations, unauthorized users can gain elevated system privileges via the Sudo host option (-h or --host). When using the default sudo security policy plugin (sudoers), the host option is intended to be used in conjunction with the list option (-l or --list) to determine what permissions a user has on a different system. However, this restriction can be bypassed, allowing a user to elevate their privileges on one system to the privileges they may have on a different system, effectively ignoring the host identifier in any sudoers rules. This vulnerability is particularly impactful for systems that share a single sudoers configuration file across multiple computers or use network-based user directories, such as LDAP, to provide sudoers rules on a system.
Statement
This vulnerability is classified as a Local Privilege Escalation (LPE), meaning an attacker needs an authenticated account before they could exploit it. Due to this restriction, the severity is rated Important. Additionally, for a system to be vulnerable, it must already be in a non-default configuration.
The system’s sudoers file must contain rules that define that user’s privileges on a different system. There are multiple mechanisms a system administrator could use to distribute sudoers rules, such as LDAP, Ansible playbooks, or via inclusion in a “Golden Image,” and therefore may be affected by this vulnerability. In environments using LDAP to manage sudoers files, look for sudoRoles objects that use sudoHost values to manage different levels of user privliges across multiple systems.
In situations where host A’s sudoers rules include permissions defined for another host B, a user on host A could use the privileges granted to them on host B while logged into host A. For example, a sudoers file on hostA and hostB might include the following rules:
Alice hostA = ALL
Bob hostB = ALL
If Bob logs into hostA and runs sudo some command, Sudo will check that Bob has permission to run some command on hostA. Since Bob does NOT have that privilege on hostA, Sudo will deny the requested command.
However, the local Sudo rules on hostA can be bypassed if Bob logs into hostA and runs sudo -h hostB some command. In this case, Sudo will verify that Bob has permission to run some command on hostB. Since Bob does have that privilege, Sudo will run the requested command on hostA, where Bob is currently logged in.
Mitigation
For environments using sudoers files: Remove rules defined in sudoers files that are for any system other than the local system.
For environments using LDAP: Use a narrow-scoped search path in the SSSD configuration so rules that don’t apply to a system are not included in the LDAP query results.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2374692: sudo: LPE via host option
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2025-32462
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32462
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32462
Content from www.sudo.ws is not included.https://www.sudo.ws/security/advisories/host_any/
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:11537 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | sudo | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10871 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10110 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10518 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10383 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10383 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10520 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10520 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10520 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update Service | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10836 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10836 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:9978 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10835 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10779 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support | sudo | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10707 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12 | rhcos | Fixed | RHSA-2025:12323 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.13 | rhcos | Fixed | RHSA-2025:15672 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14 | rhcos | Fixed | RHSA-2025:13289 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15 | rhcos | Fixed | RHSA-2025:12370 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16 | rhcos | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10781 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17 | rhcos | Fixed | RHSA-2025:12437 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18 | rhcos | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10767 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19 | rhcos | Fixed | RHSA-2025:10771 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7 | 8.8 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | High | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Changed |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.