CVE-2025-32462

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Description

A privilege escalation vulnerability was found in Sudo. In certain configurations, unauthorized users can gain elevated system privileges via the Sudo host option (-h or --host). When using the default sudo security policy plugin (sudoers), the host option is intended to be used in conjunction with the list option (-l or --list) to determine what permissions a user has on a different system. However, this restriction can be bypassed, allowing a user to elevate their privileges on one system to the privileges they may have on a different system, effectively ignoring the host identifier in any sudoers rules. This vulnerability is particularly impactful for systems that share a single sudoers configuration file across multiple computers or use network-based user directories, such as LDAP, to provide sudoers rules on a system.

Statement

This vulnerability is classified as a Local Privilege Escalation (LPE), meaning an attacker needs an authenticated account before they could exploit it. Due to this restriction, the severity is rated Important. Additionally, for a system to be vulnerable, it must already be in a non-default configuration.

The system’s sudoers file must contain rules that define that user’s privileges on a different system. There are multiple mechanisms a system administrator could use to distribute sudoers rules, such as LDAP, Ansible playbooks, or via inclusion in a “Golden Image,” and therefore may be affected by this vulnerability. In environments using LDAP to manage sudoers files, look for sudoRoles objects that use sudoHost values to manage different levels of user privliges across multiple systems.

In situations where host A’s sudoers rules include permissions defined for another host B, a user on host A could use the privileges granted to them on host B while logged into host A. For example, a sudoers file on hostA and hostB might include the following rules:

Alice	hostA = ALL
Bob	hostB = ALL

If Bob logs into hostA and runs sudo some command, Sudo will check that Bob has permission to run some command on hostA. Since Bob does NOT have that privilege on hostA, Sudo will deny the requested command.

However, the local Sudo rules on hostA can be bypassed if Bob logs into hostA and runs sudo -h hostB some command. In this case, Sudo will verify that Bob has permission to run some command on hostB. Since Bob does have that privilege, Sudo will run the requested command on hostA, where Bob is currently logged in.

Mitigation

For environments using sudoers files: Remove rules defined in sudoers files that are for any system other than the local system.

For environments using LDAP: Use a narrow-scoped search path in the SSSD configuration so rules that don’t apply to a system are not included in the LDAP query results.

Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata

Products / Services Components State Errata
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 sudo Fixed RHSA-2025:11537
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 sudo Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support sudo Fixed RHSA-2025:10871
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 sudo Fixed RHSA-2025:10110
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support sudo Fixed RHSA-2025:10518
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support sudo Fixed RHSA-2025:10383
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On sudo Fixed RHSA-2025:10383
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support sudo Fixed RHSA-2025:10520
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service sudo Fixed RHSA-2025:10520
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions sudo Fixed RHSA-2025:10520
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown Red Hat NVD
CVSS v3 Base Score 7 8.8
Attack Vector Local Local
Attack Complexity High Low
Privileges Required Low Low
User Interaction None None
Scope Unchanged Changed
Confidentiality Impact High High
Integrity Impact High High
Availability Impact High High

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

For open source software shipped by multiple vendors, the CVSS base scores may vary for each vendor's version depending on the version they ship, how they ship it, the platform, and even how the software is compiled. This makes scoring of vulnerabilities difficult for third-party vulnerability databases such as NVD that only provide a single CVSS base score for each vulnerability. Red Hat scores reflect how a vulnerability affects our products specifically.

For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?

  • "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
  • "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

A "will not fix" status means that a fix for an affected product version is not planned or not possible due to complexity, which may create additional risk.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

A deferred status means that a fix for an affected product version is not guaranteed due to higher-priority development work.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
  • Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.

What is a mitigation?

A mitigation is an action that can be taken to reduce the impact of a security vulnerability, without deploying any fixes.

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

The listed products were found to include one or more of the components that this vulnerability affects. These products underwent a thorough evaluation to determine their affectedness by this vulnerability. Note that layered products (such as container-based offerings) that consume affected components from any of the products listed in this table may be affected and are not represented.

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

In order to maintain code stability and compatibility, Red Hat usually does not rebase packages to entirely new versions. Instead, we backport fixes and new features to an older version of the package we distribute. This can result in some security scanners that only consider the package version to report the package as vulnerable. To avoid this, we suggest that you use an approved vulnerability scanner from our This content is not included.Red Hat Vulnerability Scanner Certification program.

My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?

When a product is listed as "Out of Support Scope", it means a vulnerability with the impact level assigned to this CVE is no longer covered by its current support lifecycle phase. The product has been identified to contain the impacted component, but analysis to determine whether it is affected or not by this vulnerability was not performed. The product should be assumed to be affected. Customers are advised to apply any mitigation options documented on this page, consider removing or disabling the impacted component, or upgrade to a supported version of the product that has an update available.