CVE-2025-38087
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
The MITRE CVE dictionary describes this issue as
Statement
A race condition in taprio_dev_notifier() could lead to a use-after-free (UAF) when it accesses q->oper_sched or q->admin_sched outside of an RCU read-side critical section. This could be exploited by triggering concurrent updates to the taprio scheduler (e.g., via traffic control tools). The issue is resolved by wrapping the relevant accesses in rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() and switching from rtnl_dereference() to rcu_dereference(). While the exploitability is low (requires root or CAP_NET_ADMIN), this is a clear use-after-free that can potentially compromise kernel memory. Therefore, CIA: HHH. The Privileges for the CVSS could be Low or High depending on what are the default permissions in the system (basically speaking if user has access to the qdisc, then can trigger it, but by default user would not have such access in Red Hat Enterprise Linux that limits this vulnarability impact level to Moderate). The CVSS base score is approximately: 6.7 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) in systems where access to traffic control is restricted (like Red Hat Enterprise Linux). 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) if unprivileged users are allowed to manipulate qdiscs. The related Kernel config param CONFIG_NET_SCH_TAPRIO enabled only for the latest versions of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 and disabled for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 and before.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, prevent module sch_taprio from being loaded. Please see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for how to blacklist a kernel module to prevent it from loading automatically.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2375531: kernel: net/sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_dev_notifier
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-416: Use After Free
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2025-38087
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38087
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38087
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:12662 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:12746 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:11810 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.