CVE-2025-38396
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
The MITRE CVE dictionary describes this issue as
Statement
A flaw in the anonymous inode creation logic allowed the memfd_secret mechanism to bypass LSM (e.g., SELinux) security checks due to incorrect handling of the S_PRIVATE flag. This could result in inodes being assigned without proper security labels, violating mandatory access control policies.
The vulnerability stems from calling alloc_anon_inode() without clearing the S_PRIVATE flag, which suppressed LSM enforcement on the resulting file descriptors. The patch replaces this logic with anon_inode_make_secure_inode(), ensuring consistent and secure inode labeling.
This bug could allow a privileged user or subsystem to create memory regions that bypass security controls, potentially undermining system-level isolation enforced by LSM frameworks.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2383441: kernel: fs: export anon_inode_make_secure_inode() and fix secretmem LSM bypass
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-266: Incorrect Privilege Assignment
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2025-38396
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38396
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38396
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:16904 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:20518 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 6 | 7.8 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | High | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | High |
| Availability Impact | None | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.