CVE-2025-38472
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
The MITRE CVE dictionary describes this issue as
Statement
Actual only starting from the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.
The vulnerability in nf_conntrack can be triggered by an unprivileged user under typical configurations where user and network namespaces are available (e.g., via unshare or CLONE_NEWNET). This enables the user to initiate Netfilter-based networking operations (such as NAT or connection tracking) even if the system had no prior active conntrack entries.
Since exploitation does not require elevated privileges beyond what is granted in the default namespace setup with CAP_NET_RAW or similar, the Privileges Required (PR) is assessed as Low. The primary attack vector is remote-triggered packets from user-controlled namespaces that cause conntrack allocation and destruction races, leading to a potential kernel panic (Availability: High).
Mitigation
In order to trigger the issue, it requires the ability to create user/net namespaces.
On non-containerized deployments of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, you can disable user namespaces by setting user.max_user_namespaces to 0:
# echo "user.max_user_namespaces=0" > /etc/sysctl.d/userns.conf
# sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.d/userns.conf
On containerized deployments, such as Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, do not use this mitigation as the functionality is needed to be enabled.
If nf_conntrack not being used with netfilter, then disabled it.
To mitigate this issue, prevent module nf_conntrack from being loaded. Please see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for how to blacklist a kernel module to prevent it from loading automatically.
Also check the solution about Kernel panic in __nf_ct_delete_from_lists for workaround at https://access.redhat.com/solutions/7130481 with broader details.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2383916: kernel: netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to removal of uninitialised entry
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2025-38472
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38472
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:15005 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Out of support scope | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:16880 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:17122 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions | kernel-rt | Fixed | RHSA-2025:17123 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support | kernel | Fixed | RHSA-2025:17241 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.1 | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Local | Local |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | Low |
| User Interaction | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | High | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.