CVE-2025-3931
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Yggdrasil, which acts as a system broker, allowing the processes to communicate to other children's "worker" processes through the DBus component. Yggdrasil creates a DBus method to dispatch messages to workers. However, it misses authentication and authorization checks, allowing every system user to call it. One available Yggdrasil worker acts as a package manager with capabilities to create and enable new repositories and install or remove packages.
This flaw allows an attacker with access to the system to leverage the lack of authentication on the dispatch message to force the Yggdrasil worker to install arbitrary RPM packages. This issue results in local privilege escalation, enabling the attacker to access and modify sensitive system data.
Statement
This vulnerability qualifies as Important rather than Moderate due to its direct violation of privilege boundaries and its broad post-install attack surface. The core issue lies in the com.redhat.Yggdrasil1.Dispatch() method being exposed over the system DBus without any authentication or authorization, enabling any local unprivileged user to interface with a privileged backend (package-manager worker). By leveraging this unprotected method, an attacker can install arbitrary software, execute payloads, and gain full root access, thus achieving a complete Local Privilege Escalation (LPE). While exploitation requires local access, the flaw exists in a default service path (rhc connect) recommended during system registration, increasing its exposure. Furthermore, the ability to manipulate package installation flows — a highly privileged operation — indicates a severe trust boundary violation.
Mitigation
Mitigation is either unavailable or does not meet Red Hat Product Security standards for usability, deployment, applicability, or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2362345: yggdrasil: Local privilege escalation in yggdrasil
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-280: Improper Handling of Insufficient Permissions or Privileges
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2025-3931
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3931
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3931
Content from github.com is not included.https://github.com/RedHatInsights/yggdrasil/pull/336
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | yggdrasil | Fixed | RHSA-2025:7592 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | rhc-worker-playbook | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | rhc-worker-playbook | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | rhc-worker-playbook | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Satellite 6 | yggdrasil | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.8 | |
| Attack Vector | Local | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | Low | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | |
| Integrity Impact | High | |
| Availability Impact | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Acknowledgements
This issue was discovered by Thibault Guittet (Red Hat).
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.