CVE-2025-6965

Public on

Last Modified: UTC

Important Important Impact What does this mean?
7.7 CVSS v3 Base Score

Description

A memory corruption flaw was found in SQLite. Under specific conditions a query can be generated where the number of aggregate terms could exceed the number of columns available. This issue could lead to memory corruption and subsequent unintended behavior.

Statement

This vulnerability in SQLite is categorized as Important rather than Critical because, although it involves memory corruption, the conditions required to trigger it are relatively constrained. The flaw arises when a query causes the number of aggregate terms to exceed internal limits, leading to potential buffer overflows or memory mismanagement. However, exploitation requires the ability to craft complex SQL queries and interact with the SQLite engine in a specific manner—typically through direct SQL input. There is no known evidence of arbitrary code execution, privilege escalation, or remote exploitability as a direct result of this flaw. Additionally, most SQLite deployments are embedded in applications where input is tightly controlled or sanitized.

Mitigation

Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.

Additional Information

External References

Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6965

Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-6965

Content from www.oracle.com is not included.https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html#AppendixMSQL

Content from www.sqlite.org is not included.https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/5508b56fd24016c13981ec280ecdd833007c9d8dd595edb295b984c2b487b5c8

Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata

Products / Services Components State Errata
Compliance Operator 1 compliance/openshift-compliance-content-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2025:21885
Compliance Operator 1 compliance/openshift-compliance-must-gather-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2025:21885
Compliance Operator 1 compliance/openshift-compliance-openscap-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2025:21885
Compliance Operator 1 compliance/openshift-compliance-rhel8-operator Fixed RHSA-2025:21885
File Integrity Operator 1 compliance/openshift-file-integrity-rhel8-operator Fixed RHSA-2025:21913
RHOSS-1.36-RHEL-8 openshift-serverless-1/logic-data-index-ephemeral-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2026:0934
RHOSS-1.36-RHEL-8 openshift-serverless-1/logic-data-index-postgresql-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2026:0934
RHOSS-1.36-RHEL-8 openshift-serverless-1/logic-db-migrator-tool-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2026:0934
RHOSS-1.36-RHEL-8 openshift-serverless-1/logic-jobs-service-ephemeral-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2026:0934
RHOSS-1.36-RHEL-8 openshift-serverless-1/logic-jobs-service-postgresql-rhel8 Fixed RHSA-2026:0934
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details

Important note

CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).

CVSS v3 Score Breakdown Red Hat NVD
CVSS v3 Base Score 7.7 9.8
Attack Vector Network Network
Attack Complexity High Low
Privileges Required Low None
User Interaction None None
Scope Changed Unchanged
Confidentiality Impact Low High
Integrity Impact High High
Availability Impact Low High

CVSS v3 Vector

Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L

NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation

The flaw involves improper bounds checking when handling aggregate terms in queries—specifically, the number of aggregates can exceed the number of columns allocated internally (AggInfo->aCol or aFunc), leading to memory corruption. However, the attack complexity is high (AC:H) because triggering this requires carefully crafting SQL queries that exceed internal aggregation limits (SQLITE_LIMIT_COLUMN), which are normally well within safe bounds for most applications. It also requires low privileges (PR:L), meaning an attacker must already have access to submit SQL—typically not possible in unauthenticated or sandboxed contexts. The scope is changed (S:C), as corruption could potentially affect the behavior of the host application embedding SQLite. However, the confidentiality impact is low (C:L), since memory corruption does not directly expose sensitive data, and availability is also low (A:L), as it may result in crashes but not guaranteed denial of service.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?

 For open source software shipped by multiple vendors, the CVSS base scores may vary for each vendor's version depending on the version they ship, how they ship it, the platform, and even how the software is compiled. This makes scoring of vulnerabilities difficult for third-party vulnerability databases such as NVD that only provide a single CVSS base score for each vulnerability. Red Hat scores reflect how a vulnerability affects our products specifically.

For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.

My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
  • "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
  • "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?

 A "will not fix" status means that a fix for an affected product version is not planned or not possible due to complexity, which may create additional risk.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.

What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?

 A deferred status means that a fix for an affected product version is not guaranteed due to higher-priority development work.

Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
  • Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
  • Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
  • Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.

What is a mitigation?

 A mitigation is an action that can be taken to reduce the impact of a security vulnerability, without deploying any fixes.

I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?

 The listed products were found to include one or more of the components that this vulnerability affects. These products underwent a thorough evaluation to determine their affectedness by this vulnerability. Note that layered products (such as container-based offerings) that consume affected components from any of the products listed in this table may be affected and are not represented.

Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?

 In order to maintain code stability and compatibility, Red Hat usually does not rebase packages to entirely new versions. Instead, we backport fixes and new features to an older version of the package we distribute. This can result in some security scanners that only consider the package version to report the package as vulnerable. To avoid this, we suggest that you use an approved vulnerability scanner from our This content is not included.Red Hat Vulnerability Scanner Certification program.

My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?

 When a product is listed as "Out of Support Scope", it means a vulnerability with the impact level assigned to this CVE is no longer covered by its current support lifecycle phase. The product has been identified to contain the impacted component, but analysis to determine whether it is affected or not by this vulnerability was not performed. The product should be assumed to be affected. Customers are advised to apply any mitigation options documented on this page, consider removing or disabling the impacted component, or upgrade to a supported version of the product that has an update available.