CVE-2025-69873
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in ajv. When the $data option is enabled, the value of the pattern keyword is passed directly to the JavaScript RegExp() constructor without sufficient validation. An attacker able to supply a malicious regular expression pattern can trigger a ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service), causing the application to become unresponsive and resulting in a denial of service.
Statement
To exploit this issue, the $data option must be enabled and the attacker needs to be able to send a payload with a specially crafted regular expression to the application processing the input. A 31-character payload causes approximately 44 seconds of execution, with each additional character doubling the execution time. Therefore, even a small payload can cause an application to become unresponsive and eventually result in a denial of service. Due to this reason, this flaw has been rated with an important severity.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, disable the $data feature if your application does not require it. If $data must be used, implement strict validation of the input fields that are referenced by the pattern keyword to ensure they contain only expected and safe characters.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2439070: ajv: ReDoS via $data reference
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.0 | network-observability/network-observability-console-plugin-compat-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:16874 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 | automation-gateway | Fixed | RHSA-2026:13512 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9 | automation-gateway | Fixed | RHSA-2026:13512 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 | ansible-automation-platform-26/gateway-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6309 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 | ansible-automation-platform-26/gateway-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6404 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9 | automation-platform-ui | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6277 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8 | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:9742 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9 | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6802 |
| Red Hat Edge Manager 1.0 | rhem/flightctl-ui-ocp-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:36651 |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 | eap7-wildfly | Fixed | RHSA-2026:33371 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | N/A | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Availability Impact | High | N/A | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.