CVE-2026-0915
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in glibc, the GNU C Library. When an application calls the getnetbyaddr or getnetbyaddr_r functions to resolve a network address, and the system's nsswitch.conf file is configured to use a DNS (Domain Name System) backend for network lookups, a query for a zero-valued network can lead to the disclosure of stack memory contents. This information is leaked to the configured DNS resolver, potentially allowing an attacker who controls the resolver to gain sensitive data from the affected system.
Statement
This vulnerability is rated Moderate for Red Hat products. It allows for information disclosure of stack contents to a configured DNS resolver when an application utilizes getnetbyaddr or getnetbyaddr_r with a DNS backend specified in nsswitch.conf for a zero-valued network query. This affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux and OpenShift Container Platform.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2430201: glibc: glibc: Information disclosure via zero-valued network query
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2026-0915
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0915
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0915
Content from sourceware.org is not included.https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33802
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost Management 4 | costmanagement/costmanagement-metrics-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3228 |
| Red Hat Ceph Storage 8 | rhceph/rhceph-8-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:5606 |
| Red Hat Discovery 2 | discovery/discovery-server-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4501 |
| Red Hat Discovery 2 | discovery/discovery-ui-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4501 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | glibc | Fixed | RHSA-2026:1334 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | compat-glibc | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | glibc | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | compat-glibc | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | glibc | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | glibc | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4772 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | glibc | Fixed | RHSA-2026:2786 |
| Red Hat Insights proxy 1.5 | insights-proxy/insights-proxy-container-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4655 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | rhcos | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/cds-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4943 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/haproxy-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4943 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/installer-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4943 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/rhua-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:4943 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.3 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | |
| Integrity Impact | None | |
| Availability Impact | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.