CVE-2026-10822
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
If BIND encounters a particular invalid data structure in a DNS record, it will accept the invalid data, and may subsequently abort and exit.
BIND will first need to store a DNS record for a key (KEY, DNSKEY, etc.). That key must specify a PRIVATEDNS algorithm (253), and in the algorithm identifier, improperly give a length longer than the actual identifier data. The invalid identifier will be stored. If BIND later needs to render that record to text, it will use the invalid length during processing, leading to a consistency check failing.
Statement
This Moderate impact flaw in BIND allows a specially crafted DNS key record with a PRIVATEDNS algorithm and overlong algorithm identifier to cause the named daemon to abort when rendering the record to text. The attack requires prior storage of the malformed record (requiring user interaction), limiting the immediate risk to most Red Hat deployments.
Mitigation
Upgrade to the patched release most closely related to your current version of BIND 9:
- 9.20.26
- 9.21.24
BIND Supported Preview Edition is a special feature preview branch of BIND provided to eligible ISC support customers.
- 9.20.26-S1
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2504598: bind: bind9: Key Record using PRIVATEDNS algorithm may lead to exit
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-617: Reachable Assertion
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | bind | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | bind | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | bind | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | bind | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | bind9.16 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind9.18 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | dhcp | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | bind-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54071 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8 | Affected | |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 6.5 | N/A | 6.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | Required | N/A | Required |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Availability Impact | High | N/A | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.