CVE-2026-2733
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was identified in the Docker v2 authentication endpoint of Keycloak, where tokens continue to be issued even after a Docker registry client has been administratively disabled. This means that turning the client “Enabled” setting to OFF does not fully prevent access. As a result, previously valid credentials can still be used to obtain authentication tokens. This weakens administrative controls and could allow unintended access to container registry resources.
Statement
The security impact of this vulnerability is rated as Low because successful exploitation requires valid user credentials and knowledge of the Docker client ID. While the issue does not allow privilege escalation beyond the authenticated user’s permissions, it undermines an important administrative control. By continuing to issue tokens for a disabled client, the system fails to properly enforce authorization state, potentially resulting in unintended access to protected container images.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2440895: org.keycloak/keycloak-services: Keycloak: Missing Check on Disabled Client for Docker Registry Protocol
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-285: Improper Authorization
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2026-2733
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2733
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-2733
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Build of Keycloak | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Build of Keycloak | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8 | keycloak-services | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack | keycloak-services | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 | keycloak-services | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3948 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3948 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3948 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.10 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3947 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 3.8 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | High | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | |
| Integrity Impact | Low | |
| Availability Impact | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank Joy Gilbert and Reynaldo Immanuel for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.