CVE-2026-3047
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in org.keycloak.broker.saml. When a disabled Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) client is configured as an Identity Provider (IdP)-initiated broker landing target, it can still complete the login process and establish a Single Sign-On (SSO) session. This allows a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to other enabled clients without re-authentication, effectively bypassing security restrictions.
Statement
CRITICAL: This flaw allows a disabled SAML client in Keycloak, when configured as an IdP-initiated broker landing target, to still facilitate a successful login. This bypasses the intended security control, granting an authenticated user access to other enabled clients without re-authentication. This issue affects Keycloak instances where a disabled SAML client is configured for IdP-initiated brokering and the user exists in the external Identity Provider.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, ensure that any SAML client intended to be disabled is not configured as an IdP-initiated broker landing target within Keycloak. Review your Keycloak realm configurations to identify and remove any such associations for disabled clients.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2441966: org.keycloak.broker.saml: Keycloak SAML broker: Authentication bypass due to disabled SAML client completing IdP-initiated login
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2026-3047
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3047
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3047
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.2 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3925 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.2 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3925 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.2 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3925 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.2.14 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3926 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3948 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3948 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3948 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.10 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:3947 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.8 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | Low | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | |
| Integrity Impact | High | |
| Availability Impact | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.