CVE-2026-33846
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A heap buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the DTLS handshake fragment reassembly logic of GnuTLS. The issue arises in merge_handshake_packet() where incoming handshake fragments are matched and merged based solely on handshake type, without validating that the message_length field remains consistent across all fragments of the same logical message. An attacker can exploit this by sending crafted DTLS fragments with conflicting message_length values, causing the implementation to allocate a buffer based on a smaller initial fragment and subsequently write beyond its bounds using larger, inconsistent fragments. Because the merge operation does not enforce proper bounds checking against the allocated buffer size, this results in an out-of-bounds write on the heap. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication via the DTLS handshake path and can lead to application crashes or potential memory corruption.
Statement
This vulnerability should be classified as an important flaw rather than moderate because it exposes a pre-authentication, remotely reachable heap buffer overflow in the DTLS handshake processing path, which is part of the core protocol handling logic and commonly exposed in network-facing services. The flaw enables an attacker to inject controlled data at attacker-chosen offsets and sizes beyond allocated heap boundaries by exploiting inconsistent message_length handling across fragments, effectively creating a constrained but meaningful heap write primitive. Unlike benign memory safety bugs, this condition is deterministically triggerable with a small number of crafted packets and no environmental dependencies for denial-of-service, and it targets a long-lived parsing state where memory corruption can affect adjacent heap structures. Even if reliable code execution requires additional heap manipulation or layout knowledge, the combination of remote reachability, lack of authentication, controlled memory corruption capability, and trivial crashability significantly elevates the risk profile beyond moderate severity. In real-world deployments, such primitives are often sufficient to enable heap grooming and exploitation chains, particularly in services that repeatedly process attacker-controlled input, making this a materially important security flaw.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2450625: gnutls: GnuTLS: Denial of Service via heap buffer overflow in DTLS handshake fragment reassembly
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-130: Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2026-33846
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33846
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33846
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | gnutls | Fixed | RHSA-2026:20613 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support | gnutls | Fixed | RHSA-2026:26409 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | gnutls | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | gnutls | Affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | gnutls | Fixed | RHSA-2026:20611 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | gnutls | Fixed | RHSA-2026:20612 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | gnutls-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:13274 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | rhcos | Affected | |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/cds-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:26319 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/haproxy-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:26319 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/installer-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:26319 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/rhua-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:26319 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | |
| Integrity Impact | None | |
| Availability Impact | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.