CVE-2026-34070
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in LangChain. Multiple functions in langchain_core.prompts.loading read files from paths embedded in deserialized configuration dictionaries without validation for directory traversal or absolute path injection. When an application passes user-influenced prompt configurations to load_prompt() or load_prompt_from_config(), an attacker can read arbitrary files on the host filesystem.
Statement
This flaw is exploitable in applications that accept prompt configs from untrusted sources, including low-code AI builders and API wrappers that expose load_prompt_from_config().
Also, the affected functions (load_prompt, load_prompt_from_config and the .save() method on prompt classes) are undocumented legacy APIs. They are superseded by the dumpd/dumps/load/loads serialization APIs in langchain_core.load, which do not perform filesystem reads and use an allowlist-based security model.
An attacker who controls or influences the prompt configuration dictionary can read files outside the intended directory, such as cloud-mounted secrets, internal system prompts, cloud credentials, Kubernetes manifests, CI/CD configs and application settings.
Due to these reasons, this vulnerability has been rated with an important severity.
Mitigation
As described in the statement section, the vulnerable methods are legacy APIs and their use should be avoided. To mitigate this issue, the dumpd, dumps, load and loads methods from langchain_core.load should be used, as they supersede the legacy API and provide a more secure serialization model.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2453287: langchain: path traversal in legacy load_prompt functions in langchain-core
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2026-34070
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34070
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34070
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenShift Lightspeed | openshift-lightspeed/lightspeed-service-api-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-chatbot-rhel8 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | ansible-automation-platform-26/lightspeed-rhel9 | Will not fix | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 | ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-rhel8 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:24766 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-llama-stack-core-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-trustyai-nemo-guardrails-server-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | rhoai/odh-mlflow-rhel9 | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | None | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | |
| Integrity Impact | None | |
| Availability Impact | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.