CVE-2026-3591
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in BIND, specifically in the named server's handling of DNS queries signed with SIG(0). A remote attacker could exploit this use-after-return vulnerability by sending a specially-crafted DNS request. This could cause an Access Control List (ACL) to improperly match an IP address, potentially leading to unauthorized access to resources.
Statement
This vulnerability has a Moderate impact. A use-after-return flaw in the named server of bind9 allows a remote attacker to send a specially-crafted DNS request signed with SIG(0). This can lead to improper Access Control List (ACL) matching, potentially granting unauthorized access to resources. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 and 9 ship with BIND versions 9.16 and 9.18 respectively, which are not affected by this flaw. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 is affected.
Mitigation
Restrict network access to the `named` service to trusted clients and networks. Configure firewall rules to limit inbound connections to the DNS service port (UDP/TCP 53). For example, using `firewall-cmd --permanent --add-rich-rule='rule family="ipv4" source address="<TRUSTED_IP_RANGE>" port port="53" protocol="udp" accept'` and `firewall-cmd --reload`. This action may impact DNS resolution for clients outside the specified trusted networks. A service reload or restart may be required for changes to take effect.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2451298: bind: BIND: Unauthorized access due to use-after-return vulnerability in DNS query handling
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-825: Expired Pointer Dereference
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2026-3591
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3591
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3591
Content from downloads.isc.org is not included.https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.20.21
Content from downloads.isc.org is not included.https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.21.20
Content from kb.isc.org is not included.https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-3591
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | bind | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | bind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | bind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | bind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | bind9.16 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | bind9.18 | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | dhcp | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | bind-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6935 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | rhcos | Not affected |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 5.4 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | Low | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | |
| Integrity Impact | Low | |
| Availability Impact | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.