CVE-2026-42789
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Erlang OTP's public_key module. This vulnerability (CWE-295), related to improper certificate validation, allows a non-Certificate Authority (CA) certificate to be accepted as an intermediate issuer. A remote attacker, holding an end-entity certificate issued by a trusted CA, can exploit this by forging leaf certificates for arbitrary identities. This can lead to compromised server identity verification on the client side and client certificate verification on mutual Transport Layer Security (mTLS) servers, undermining the trust in certificate-based authentication.
Statement
This is an Important vulnerability where Erlang OTP's public_key module improperly validates certificate chains. A remote attacker with an existing end-entity certificate from a trusted Certificate Authority can forge new leaf certificates, leading to compromised server or client identity verification in TLS/mTLS connections. This impacts applications within Red Hat OpenStack Platform and Community Projects that utilize the default verifier in the OTP ssl application. Because an attacker must be able to create or locate a certificate with specific attributes, Red Hat assesses the impact of this vulnerability as Important.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2482093: erlang: Erlang OTP public_key: Certificate chain forgery via improper trust chain validation
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42789
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42789
Content from cna.erlef.org is not included.https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-42789.html
Content from osv.dev is not included.https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-42789
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 | erlang | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54757 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 | erlang | Affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Services on OpenShift 18.0 | erlang | Fixed | RHSA-2026:39809 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8 | 4.8 | 8 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | High | High |
| Privileges Required | None | None | None |
| User Interaction | Required | None | Required |
| Scope | Changed | Unchanged | Changed |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | Low | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | Low | High |
| Availability Impact | None | None | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.