CVE-2026-42955
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A "ghost domain names" flaw in Unbound allows a remote attacker controlling a domain to manipulate cached DNS records. By extending the lifetime of outdated DNS information, an attacker can cause clients to receive stale or misleading DNS responses.
Statement
This Low impact DNS cache integrity issue in Unbound allows an attacker to extend the window for serving outdated DNS information. Exploitation requires an adversary to control a ghost zone and query a vulnerable Unbound instance. The risk is elevated if the non-default harden-referral-path: yes configuration is enabled, as it removes the need for a client query.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, ensure harden-referral-path is set to no (the default) to prevent Unbound from implicitly triggering the vulnerable cache overwrites.
Additionally, restrict recursive DNS access strictly to trusted clients to prevent external attackers from manually triggering the flaw.
Restart the Unbound service to apply these configuration changes.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2506144: unbound: Unbound: DNS cache integrity issue
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
External References
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | unbound | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | unbound | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | unbound | Not affected | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | unbound | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | unbound | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | unbound-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:43588 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9 | Fix deferred | |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 3.7 | N/A | 3.7 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | N/A | High |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Integrity Impact | Low | N/A | Low |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.