CVE-2026-43866
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Apache Camel JMS components. A remote attacker can exploit a deserialization vulnerability by sending a specially crafted ObjectMessage to a queue or topic consumed by an affected Camel application. This bypasses existing security checks, allowing the attacker to inject arbitrary Exchange state. This injection can lead to the manipulation of routing, headers, exchange properties, and error handling within the application.
Statement
A flaw was found in the Apache Camel JMS components. The JmsBinding.extractBodyFromJms() method deserializes incoming JMS ObjectMessage payloads when the mapJmsMessage option is enabled (the default). The prior fix for CVE-2026-40860 can be bypassed using a crafted ObjectMessage containing a DefaultExchangeHolder, which resides within the allowed org.apache.camel namespace. Once deserialized, it injects arbitrary Exchange state including message body, headers, and properties without requiring any deserialization gadget chain. Red Hat builds of Apache Camel for Spring Boot and Quarkus ship the affected camel-jms and camel-amqp components.
Mitigation
Restrict publish access to JMS queues and topics consumed by Camel applications via broker authorization. Note that a JMS-provider deserialization allow-list does not mitigate this specific bypass because the crafted payload uses only universally-trusted classes within the org.apache.camel namespace.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2497297: camel-jms: Apache Camel JMS components: Arbitrary Exchange state injection
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3 | camel-jms | Not affected | |
| Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.3 for Spring Boot 3.5.16 | camel-jms | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54622 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.1 | N/A | 7.3 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | N/A | Low |
| Integrity Impact | High | N/A | Low |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | Low |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.