CVE-2026-44393
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in OpenStack oslo.messaging. The RabbitMQ driver does not properly verify the hostname of the message broker when establishing a TLS (Transport Layer Security) connection. An attacker capable of intercepting control-plane network traffic can exploit this vulnerability to impersonate the RabbitMQ broker. This allows the attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack, potentially leading to the disclosure or manipulation of sensitive RPC (Remote Procedure Call) and notification traffic.
Statement
This Important flaw in OpenStack oslo.messaging impacts Red Hat OpenStack Platform and OpenShift Container Platform when using RabbitMQ with TLS. The vulnerability arises from the RabbitMQ driver's failure to perform proper hostname verification during TLS connection establishment. This oversight enables an attacker capable of intercepting control-plane network traffic to impersonate the RabbitMQ broker, potentially leading to man-in-the-middle attacks that compromise the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive RPC and notification data.
Mitigation
To mitigate the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks, restrict network access to the RabbitMQ message broker. Configure firewall rules to permit inbound connections to the RabbitMQ port (typically 5672 or 5671 for AMQPS) only from authorized hosts and services within the control plane. This operational measure reduces the exposure to attackers attempting to intercept and impersonate the broker.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2484835: oslo.messaging: openstack: OpenStack oslo.messaging: Man-in-the-middle attack via improper TLS hostname verification
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | python-oslo-messaging | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 | python-oslo-messaging | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54757 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 | python-oslo-messaging | Affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0 | python-oslo-messaging | Affected | |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.4 | N/A | 7.4 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | N/A | High |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | N/A | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | N/A | High |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.