CVE-2026-44918
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in OpenStack Ironic. An authenticated project manager can change the node associated with Volume Connectors or Volume Target objects, potentially changing the project permitted to access the object. Volume Connectors contain secrets in environments configuring boot from volume with iSCSI volumes. Additionally, a project manager with the ability to create nodes can use the UUID of a node not owned by their project as a parent node when creating a new node. This mismatched child node can then be used to impact operations on the parent, such as forcing it to power on.
Statement
The Red Hat Product Security team has assessed the severity of this vulnerability as Important. An authenticated project manager can reparent Volume Connectors and Volume Targets to nodes in a different project, crossing project authorization boundaries and potentially exposing iSCSI secrets used for boot-from-volume configurations. However, exploitation requires the 'manager' role, which is not a default role in OpenStack and must be explicitly granted by an administrator. The attacker must also know the UUID of the target node in the other project. In Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0, the automatic_lessee feature defaults to false and did not function correctly; a properly working version was only introduced in upstream release 26.1.0 (gazpacho), which Red Hat does not ship. The parent/child node relationship capability, introduced in upstream Ironic 22.0.0, has never been shipped in any version of Red Hat OpenStack Platform or Red Hat OpenStack Services on OpenShift. These factors reduce the practical attack surface in Red Hat shipped configurations.
Mitigation
Operators who are concerned they may have had this occur are encouraged to perform a basic audit of node configuration, for instance, ensuring the expected number of volume targets and volume connectors are present. Operators can also use the provided ironic-status upgrade check to identify misconfigured nodes.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2494664: openstack-ironic: Prevent rehoming resources to nodes with different owner
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-1220: Insufficient Granularity of Access Control
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44918
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44918
Content from launchpad.net is not included.https://launchpad.net/bugs/2150256
Content from launchpad.net is not included.https://launchpad.net/bugs/2150450
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19 | openshift4/ose-ironic-rhel9 | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:57408 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.2 | openshift4/ose-ironic-rhel9 | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:54583 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21 | openshift4/ose-ironic-rhel9 | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:54602 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22 | openshift4/ose-ironic-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:51038 |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | openstack-ironic | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 | openstack-ironic | Not affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 | openstack-ironic | Affected | |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0 | openstack-ironic | Affected | |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.7 | N/A | 5.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | High | N/A | High |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Changed | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | N/A | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | N/A | Low |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Red Hat CVSS v3 Score Explanation
Scope changed from Unchanged to Changed per discussion with Julia Kreger (OpenStack Ironic PTL). The attacker operates within their own project but can access volume connectors and secrets belonging to a different project, crossing project authorization boundaries. PR kept as High per Julia: manager role is admin-scoped within project, and attacker needs UUID of target node (requiring access to the other project).
Acknowledgements
Upstream acknowledges Julia Kreger (OpenStack) as the original reporter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.