CVE-2026-45740
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in protobufjs. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by providing a crafted JSON descriptor with deeply nested namespace definitions. This can lead to the exhaustion of the JavaScript call stack during descriptor loading, making the application unresponsive.
Statement
This is an Important denial of service flaw in protobufjs, which could allow a remote attacker to exhaust the JavaScript call stack by providing a specially crafted JSON descriptor with deeply nested namespace definitions. This vulnerability impacts Red Hat products that utilize protobufjs for processing protobuf definitions potentially leading to application unresponsiveness.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, avoid loading untrusted protobuf JSON descriptors in applications utilizing protobufjs. If untrusted descriptors must be processed, implement validation at an outer boundary to reject excessively nested structures. Alternatively, isolate the descriptor loading process in an environment that can be safely restarted in case of a denial of service.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2477081: protobufjs: protobufjs: Denial of Service via crafted JSON descriptors
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-776: Improper Restriction of Recursive Entity References in DTDs ('XML Entity Expansion')
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 | cryostat/cryostat-grafana-dashboard-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:48151 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.2 | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal | Fixed | RHSA-2026:42815 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.2 | ansible-automation-platform/bootc-automation-portal-rhel9 | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:51162 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10 | rhdh/red-hat-developer-hub-backstage-plugin-lightspeed-backend | Fixed | RHSA-2026:48126 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10 | rhdh/red-hat-developer-hub-backstage-plugin-orchestrator-backend | Fixed | RHSA-2026:48126 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10 | rhdh/red-hat-developer-hub-backstage-plugin-orchestrator-backend-module-loki | Fixed | RHSA-2026:48126 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10 | rhdh/red-hat-developer-hub-backstage-plugin-scaffolder-backend-module-orchestrator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:48126 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10 | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:49642 |
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9 | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:41929 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | rh-podman-desktop | Fixed | RHSA-2026:57590 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | 7.5 | 5.3 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None | None |
| User Interaction | None | None | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None | None |
| Availability Impact | High | High | Low |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.