CVE-2026-4636
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated user with the uma_protection role can bypass User-Managed Access (UMA) policy validation. This allows the attacker to include resource identifiers owned by other users in a policy creation request, even if the URL path specifies an attacker-owned resource. Consequently, the attacker gains unauthorized permissions to victim-owned resources, enabling them to obtain a Requesting Party Token (RPT) and access sensitive information or perform unauthorized actions.
Statement
This Important vulnerability in Keycloak allows an authenticated user with the uma_protection role to bypass User-Managed Access (UMA) policy validation. Exploitation requires that victim users have created UMA-protected resources with ownerManagedAccess enabled and that authorization services are enabled on the client. This flaw enables an attacker to gain unauthorized permissions to victim-owned resources within Red Hat Build of Keycloak.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Additional Information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2450251: keycloak: Keycloak: UMA policy bypass allows authenticated users to gain unauthorized access to victim-owned resources.
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-551: Incorrect Behavior Order: Authorization Before Parsing and Canonicalization
- FAQ: Frequently asked questions about CVE-2026-4636
- Offline Security Data data is available for integration with other systems. See Offline Security Data API to get started.
External References
Content from www.cve.org is not included.https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4636
Content from nvd.nist.gov is not included.https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4636
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.2 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6476 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.2 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6476 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.2 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6476 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.2.15 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6475 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6478 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6478 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6478 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.11 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:6477 |
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
| CVSS v3 Score Breakdown | Red Hat | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.1 | |
| Attack Vector | Network | |
| Attack Complexity | Low | |
| Privileges Required | Low | |
| User Interaction | None | |
| Scope | Unchanged | |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | |
| Integrity Impact | High | |
| Availability Impact | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.