CVE-2026-46592
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the Apache Camel CXF SOAP component. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the operationName header in an unauthenticated HTTP request. This improper input validation allows the attacker to force the CxfProducer to invoke unintended SOAP operations on the backend service. This could lead to a 'confused deputy' scenario, where a read operation is replaced with a destructive one, impacting the integrity of the backend service.
Statement
This is an Important flaw in the Apache Camel CXF SOAP component, allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to manipulate SOAP operation names via HTTP headers. When an HTTP consumer bridges into a cxf: producer, an attacker can force the backend service to execute unintended operations, potentially replacing read operations with destructive ones. This 'confused deputy' scenario impacts the integrity of services utilizing affected Red Hat build of Apache Camel and Enterprise Application Platform configurations.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, ensure that the `operationName` and `operationNamespace` headers are not sourced from untrusted input when bridging an HTTP consumer to a `cxf:` producer in Apache Camel routes. Configure the route to explicitly strip these headers from any untrusted ingress before they reach the `cxf:` producer. Subsequently, set the intended SOAP operation from a trusted, internal source within the route. This prevents a remote attacker from manipulating backend service operations. Changes to route configurations may require a service restart to take effect.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2497295: org.apache.camel/camel-cxf: Apache Camel CXF SOAP: Remote attacker can execute unintended operations via header manipulation
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.18 for Quarkus 3.33 | camel-cxf-common | Fixed | RHSA-2026:48118 |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack | camel-cxf-common | Not affected | |
| Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3 | camel-cxf-common | Affected | |
| Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.3 for Spring Boot 3.5.16 | camel-cxf-common | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54622 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | N/A | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | N/A | High |
| Integrity Impact | High | N/A | None |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.