CVE-2026-54297
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Faraday, an HTTP client library. The Faraday::NestedParamsEncoder, which handles nested query parameters, does not limit the depth of nested query strings during decoding. A remote attacker can exploit this by sending a specially crafted query string, causing the application to build an excessively deep data structure. This can lead to a SystemStackError, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) by crashing the application's processing thread or worker.
Statement
This flaw has an Important impact as applications utilizing the Faraday HTTP client library in Red Hat products are susceptible to a denial of service. A remote attacker can send a specially crafted nested query string, causing the Faraday::NestedParamsEncoder to create an overly deep data structure. This unbounded recursion exhausts system resources, leading to a SystemStackError and crashing the application's processing thread.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2492252: faraday: Faraday: Denial of Service via crafted nested query strings
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
External References
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8 | rubygem-faraday | Fixed | RHSA-2026:50223 |
| Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 9 | rubygem-faraday | Fixed | RHSA-2026:50223 |
| Red Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9 | rubygem-faraday | Fixed | RHSA-2026:50222 |
| Red Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9 | rubygem-faraday | Fixed | RHSA-2026:50263 |
| Red Hat Satellite 6.19 for RHEL 9 | rubygem-faraday | Fixed | RHSA-2026:50221 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | N/A | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Availability Impact | High | N/A | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.