CVE-2026-55653
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in OpenSSH. A malicious SSH server can exploit a double free vulnerability in the Diffie-Hellman Group Exchange (DH-GEX) client path. This occurs during FIPS (Federal Information Processing Standards) mode known-group validation when the client processes attacker-controlled DH-GEX group parameters. Successful exploitation leads to client-side process termination, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
Statement
This Moderate flaw in OpenSSH affects clients operating in FIPS mode when negotiating Diffie-Hellman Group Exchange (DH-GEX) with a malicious SSH server. While it can lead to client process termination, resulting in a denial of service, the impact is limited to availability and does not result in broader system compromise. In order to exploit this vulnerability the attacker needs to trick the user to connect to an untrusted malicious server or compromise the server first. The availability impact is considered Low as the only impacted process is the single run of the SSH client trying to connect to the malicious server.
This vulnerability affects only the OpenSSH versions shipped with Red Hat products.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, OpenSSH clients operating in FIPS mode should avoid negotiating the `diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256` key exchange algorithm. This can be achieved by explicitly listing allowed key exchange algorithms in the client's SSH configuration file (e.g., `/etc/ssh/ssh_config` or `~/.ssh/config`), ensuring `diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256` is *not* included. For example, to use a subset of common algorithms, you might configure:
KexAlgorithms curve25519-sha256@libssh.org,ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1
(Note: The above example `KexAlgorithms` list is illustrative and should be adjusted based on your environment's security requirements.)
Additionally, avoid using non-fatal client flows, such as `ssh-keyscan`, against untrusted SSH servers while FIPS mode is enabled. Changes to `ssh_config` will take effect for new SSH connections.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2462351: openssh: Double free in Red Hat Enterprise Linux versions of OpenSSH DH-GEX client path during FIPS known-group validation leads to client-side denial of service
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-415: Double Free
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | openssh | Fixed | RHSA-2026:47757 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | openssh | Fixed | RHSA-2026:47755 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | openssh | Fixed | RHSA-2026:47756 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | openssh-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:36759 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/installer-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54387 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/rhua-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54387 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/installer-tp-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:58981 |
| Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5 | rhui5/rhua-tp-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:58981 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 4.3 | 6.5 | 4.3 |
| Attack Vector | Network | Network | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Low | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | None | None |
| User Interaction | Required | Required | Required |
| Scope | Unchanged | Unchanged | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | None | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | None | None |
| Availability Impact | Low | High | Low |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
NVD CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Acknowledgements
This issue was discovered by In partnership with Red Hat (Aisle.com).
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.