CVE-2026-56208
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A heap buffer overflow vulnerability was found in libaom, the reference AV1 codec implementation. A flaw in the AV1 encoder's Look-Ahead Processing (LAP) mode causes the first-pass stats ring buffer wrap-around guard to be bypassed when g_lag_in_frames is set to 1 or higher. This results in a 232-byte out-of-bounds write on every encoded frame after the second, corrupting adjacent heap objects. An attacker who can influence encoder configuration in a transcoding service or WebRTC session could exploit this to cause a denial of service (process crash) or potentially achieve code execution.
Statement
This vulnerability is rated as Important severity because a heap buffer overflow with attacker-influenced data can cause reliable denial of service and potentially lead to code execution, though the attacker has only indirect control over the written values (encoder-computed statistics). In Red Hat products, libaom ships bundled within Firefox and Thunderbird as a statically-linked dependency used for AV1 decoding and WebRTC encoding. The vulnerable code path requires the encoder to be configured with g_lag_in_frames >= 1 (Look-Ahead Processing mode). In Firefox's WebRTC implementation, the encoder configuration is controlled by the browser itself and not exposed to remote peers, which significantly limits the attack surface compared to standalone transcoding services. RHEL-AI 3.4 and Hummingbird 1 ship standalone libaom (aom) packages at versions within the affected range. Applications on those platforms that use the libaom encoder API with LAP mode and accept untrusted configuration input are vulnerable.
Mitigation
There is no complete mitigation for this vulnerability. The following measures can reduce risk:
1. If using libaom as a standalone encoder library, avoid setting g_lag_in_frames to values >= 1 when processing untrusted input, or validate all encoder configuration parameters before passing them to the libaom API.
2. For Firefox and Thunderbird, ensure browsers are updated to versions that include the patched libaom (v3.14.0 or later).
3. For standalone libaom deployments (RHEL-AI, Hummingbird), restrict access to the encoding service to trusted clients only.
4. Apply network-level access controls to limit who can submit video for encoding.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2490799: libaom: libaom: heap buffer overflow in AV1 encoder first-pass stats buffer via LAP mode
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support | firefox | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54181 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support | firefox | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54248 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | firefox | Fixed | RHSA-2026:47105 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | firefox | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54180 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On | firefox | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54180 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | firefox | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54259 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On | firefox | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54259 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update Service | firefox | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54339 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions | firefox | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54339 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | firefox | Fixed | RHSA-2026:47104 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.6 | N/A | 7.6 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | Required | N/A | Required |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | Low | N/A | Low |
| Integrity Impact | Low | N/A | Low |
| Availability Impact | High | N/A | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank The FuzzAnything Team (FuzzAnything) for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.