CVE-2026-56209
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
An arbitrary address write vulnerability was found in libaom, the reference AV1 codec implementation. A missing bounds check in the SVC (Scalable Video Coding) layer ID control function allows an attacker to inject an arbitrary pointer into the cyclic refresh map field via crafted image pixel values. The encoder then writes approximately 1,200 bytes at the attacker-controlled address. This is fully deterministic and does not require a separate information leak. An attacker who can supply frames to a network-facing libaom encoder with SVC enabled could exploit this for denial of service or potential code execution.
Statement
This vulnerability is rated as Critical severity because it provides a fully deterministic arbitrary address write primitive that requires no information leak and is self-bootstrapping from attacker-controlled pixel values. The 1,200-byte write at an attacker-chosen address is sufficient for control flow hijacking. In Red Hat products, libaom ships bundled within Firefox and Thunderbird. The vulnerable code path requires the SVC (Scalable Video Coding) encoder feature to be enabled and the attacker to control both the layer_id configuration and the image frame pixel values. In Firefox's WebRTC implementation, SVC encoding parameters and frame submission are managed internally by the browser; a remote peer cannot directly set arbitrary layer IDs or inject pixel values into the local encoder. This significantly reduces exploitability in the browser context. RHEL-AI 3.4 (aom 3.12.0) and Hummingbird 1 (aom 3.13.3) ship standalone libaom packages within the affected version range. Services on those platforms that expose the SVC encoder API with attacker-controlled layer configuration and frame input are at highest risk.
Mitigation
There is no complete mitigation for this vulnerability. The following measures can reduce risk:
1. If using libaom as a standalone encoder library with SVC enabled, validate that spatial_layer_id and temporal_layer_id values are within the configured range [0, configured_layers) before calling aom_codec_control with AV1E_SET_SVC_LAYER_ID.
2. Restrict access to encoding services to trusted clients only. Do not expose libaom SVC encoder configuration to untrusted input.
3. For Firefox and Thunderbird, ensure browsers are updated to versions that include the patched libaom (v3.14.0 or later).
4. Deploy encoding services with ASLR, stack canaries, and other exploit mitigation technologies enabled.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2490800: libaom: libaom: arbitrary address write via SVC layer context OOB and cyclic refresh map pointer hijack
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:61627 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/model-opt-cuda-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:61628 |
| Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:61629 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.3 for RHEL 9 | aom | Fixed | RHSA-2026:51100 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.4 for RHEL 9 | aom | Fixed | RHSA-2026:51146 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.5 for RHEL 9 | aom | Fixed | RHSA-2026:42875 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | aom-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:30814 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4 | rhoai/odh-mlserver-rhel9 | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:60520 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4 | rhoai/odh-th06-cpu-torch210-py312-rhel9 | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:60520 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4 | rhoai/odh-th06-cuda130-torch210-py312-rhel9 | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:60520 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.1 | N/A | 7.1 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | Required | N/A | Required |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Integrity Impact | Low | N/A | Low |
| Availability Impact | High | N/A | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Acknowledgements
Red Hat would like to thank The FuzzAnything Team (FuzzAnything) for reporting this issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.