CVE-2026-58040
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in Node.js. An incomplete fix for a previous vulnerability allows the HTTPS Agent to reuse Transport Layer Security (TLS) sessions, bypassing hostname verification across different identity policies. This could enable an attacker to impersonate a legitimate server, leading to information disclosure or other security breaches.
Statement
This issue is rated Moderate (CVSS 6.3) because successful exploitation allows session-hijacking and information disclosure without affecting system integrity or availability (C:H, I:N, A:N). The flaw occurs when an HTTPS Agent reuses an existing TLS session across requests with differing identity policies, skipping host verification. An attacker must already sit in a privileged network position (AV:N/AC:H) to perform a man-in-the-middle attack and intercept traffic intended for a distinct target on the same TLS session.
Applications that explicitly configure unique HTTPS agents per target host, avoid TLS session caching, or do not make outbound HTTPS requests to varied third-party endpoints using shared client instances are not at risk.
Mitigation
To mitigate this issue, Node.js applications should be designed to explicitly configure unique HTTPS agents for each distinct target host. Alternatively, applications can avoid TLS session caching when making outbound HTTPS requests to varied third-party endpoints using shared client instances. Implementing these application-level changes will prevent the vulnerable behavior of skipping hostname verification. Applications may require a restart to apply these changes.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2509175: nodejs: HTTPS Agent TLS session reuse skips hostname verification
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-322: Key Exchange without Entity Authentication
External References
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | nodejs22 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | nodejs24 | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | nodejs:22/nodejs | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | nodejs:24/nodejs | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | nodejs:22/nodejs | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | nodejs:24/nodejs | Fix deferred | |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | nodejs26-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:48273 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | nodejs22-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:48305 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | nodejs24-main | Fixed | RHSA-2026:48537 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | nodejs20 | Will not fix | |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 6.3 | N/A | 6.3 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | High | N/A | High |
| Privileges Required | Low | N/A | Low |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Changed | N/A | Changed |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | N/A | High |
| Integrity Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
cve.org CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.