CVE-2026-6479
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in PostgreSQL. Uncontrolled recursion during SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and GSS (Generic Security Service) negotiation allows an attacker to achieve a sustained denial of service. This can be exploited by an attacker with access to a PostgreSQL AF_UNIX socket. If SSL and GSS are both disabled, the same denial of service can be achieved via a PostgreSQL TCP socket.
Statement
Uncontrolled recursion during PostgreSQL SSL and GSS negotiation allows an attacker able to connect to a PostgreSQL socket to trigger sustained CPU/stack exhaustion, resulting in denial of service. This affects the core connection-negotiation path, which runs unconditionally for every incoming connection attempt regardless of configuration — there is no optional feature or code path that must be enabled for exploitation, unlike some other recent flaws in this batch. Fix versions are 18.4, 17.10, 16.14, 15.18, and 14.23; PostgreSQL 12 and 13 branches are not listed as affected by upstream and do not contain the vulnerable recursion path. Affects were determined purely by comparing each shipped build's PostgreSQL version against these per-major-version fix thresholds.
Mitigation
Upgrade to PostgreSQL 18.4, 17.10, 16.14, 15.18, or 14.23 (matching your major version) or later. Restricting network/socket access to trusted clients reduces exposure but does not eliminate the vulnerability.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2477445: postgresql: PostgreSQL: Denial of Service via uncontrolled recursion in SSL/GSS negotiation
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-606: Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
External References
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | postgresql18 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:27742 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | postgresql16 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:27743 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support | postgresql16 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:27718 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | postgresql:15 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:26181 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | postgresql:16 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:28143 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | postgresql:12 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:52396 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | postgresql:12 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:61255 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On | postgresql:12 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:61255 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support | postgresql:12 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:61254 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On | postgresql:12 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:61254 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | N/A | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Availability Impact | High | N/A | High |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.