CVE-2026-69192
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in the ip-address library. This library incorrectly interprets IPv4 address octets with leading zeros as decimal, while standard network parsers interpret them as octal. This inconsistency can cause applications to misclassify network targets, allowing a remote attacker to bypass security measures like Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) filters and potentially gain unauthorized access to internal systems.
Statement
This Important flaw in the ip-address JavaScript library can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and trust-boundary bypass. The library's inconsistent parsing of IP address octets with leading zeros, which it interprets as decimal while the network stack interprets them as octal, can cause applications to misclassify internal IP addresses as external. This discrepancy can bypass security filters designed to prevent access to internal resources.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2510801: ip-address: ip-address: Inconsistent IP address parsing leads to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and trust-boundary bypass
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-1389: Incorrect Parsing of Numbers with Different Radices
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | nodejs22 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:55541 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | rh-podman-desktop | Fixed | RHSA-2026:57590 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | nodejs24 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:58819 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support | nodejs22 | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:64817 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | nodejs:24 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54371 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | nodejs:22 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:54530 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | nodejs:22 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:55601 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | nodejs:24 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:55603 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.6 Extended Update Support | nodejs:22 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:62416 |
| multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.17 | multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9 | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:59593 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 8.6 | N/A | N/A |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | N/A |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | N/A |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | N/A |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | N/A |
| Scope | Changed | N/A | N/A |
| Confidentiality Impact | High | N/A | N/A |
| Integrity Impact | None | N/A | N/A |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | N/A |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.