CVE-2026-75899
Public on
Last Modified:
Description
A flaw was found in fast-uri, a URI parser for Node.js. The component incorrectly decodes percent escapes in a hostname twice during URI parsing and authority recomposition. This double decoding can allow a remote attacker to manipulate a URI to point to a different network destination, such as a loopback address. This vulnerability can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and bypass host-based security policies.
Statement
This flaw in the fast-uri library, used by applications for URI parsing, allows for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and host-policy bypass. By crafting a doubly percent-encoded hostname in an untrusted HTTP-family URI, an attacker could redirect internal application requests to arbitrary network destinations, potentially bypassing security controls and accessing internal services. This risk is present in Red Hat products that process untrusted URIs using affected versions of fast-uri.
Mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Additional information
- This content is not included.Bugzilla 2521778: fast-uri: fast-uri: Server-Side Request Forgery via repeated hostname percent-decoding
- Content from cwe.mitre.org is not included.CWE-140: Improper Neutralization of Delimiters
Affected Packages and Issued Red Hat Security Errata
Unless explicitly stated as not affected, all previous versions of packages in any minor update stream of a product listed here should be assumed vulnerable, although may not have been subject to full analysis.
| Products / Services | Components | State | Errata |
|---|---|---|---|
| Migration Toolkit for Applications 8 | mta/mta-solution-server-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Migration Toolkit for Containers | rhmtc/openshift-migration-ui-rhel8 | Affected | |
| Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes | multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Network Observability Operator | network-observability/network-observability-console-plugin-pf5-rhel9 | Affected | |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.1 | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:65118 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.2 | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:65155 |
| Red Hat Discovery 2 | discovery/discovery-ui-rhel9 | Fixed | RHSA-2026:61783 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | grafana13-1-main | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:60855 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | grafana13-2-main | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:60856 |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | grafana12-4-main | Fixed | This content is not included.RHSA-2026:60866 |
| No matching records found | |||
Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) Score Details
Important note
CVSS scores for open source components depend on vendor-specific factors (e.g. version or build chain). Therefore, Red Hat's score and impact rating can be different from NVD and other vendors. Red Hat remains the authoritative CVE Naming Authorities (CNA) source for its products and services (see Red Hat classifications ).
CVSS v3 Score Breakdown
| Red Hat | NVD | cve.org | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS v3 Base Score | 7.5 | N/A | 7.5 |
| Attack Vector | Network | N/A | Network |
| Attack Complexity | Low | N/A | Low |
| Privileges Required | None | N/A | None |
| User Interaction | None | N/A | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | N/A | Unchanged |
| Confidentiality Impact | None | N/A | None |
| Integrity Impact | High | N/A | High |
| Availability Impact | None | N/A | None |
CVSS v3 Vector
Red Hat CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
cve.org CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Red Hat's CVSS v3 score or Impact different from other vendors?
For more information, see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/762393.
My product is listed as "Under investigation" or "Affected", when will Red Hat release a fix for this vulnerability?
- "Under investigation" doesn't necessarily mean that the product is affected by this vulnerability. It only means that our Analysis Team is still working on determining whether the product is affected and how it is affected.
- "Affected" means that our Analysis Team has determined that this product is affected by this vulnerability and might release a fix to address this in the near future.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Will not fix"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Upgrade to a supported product version that includes a fix for this vulnerability (recommended).
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
What can I do if my product is listed as "Fix deferred"?
Available options depend mostly on the Impact of the vulnerability and the current Life Cycle phase of your product. Overall, you have the following options:
- Apply a mitigation (if one exists).
- Open a This content is not included.support case to request a prioritization of releasing a fix for this vulnerability.
- Red Hat Engineering focuses on addressing high-priority issues based on their complexity or limited lifecycle support. Therefore, lower-priority issues will not receive immediate fixes.
What is a mitigation?
I have a Red Hat product but it is not in the above list, is it affected?
Why is my security scanner reporting my product as vulnerable to this vulnerability even though my product version is fixed or not affected?
My product is listed as "Out of Support Scope". What does this mean?
Not sure what something means? Check out our Security Glossary.